Oct 22

The Door to Saturn

3 comments

I really enjoyed the discussion of Clark Ashton Smith's "The Door to Saturn", even though I think your conclusions are suspect. Granted, CAS' fiction is an acquired taste, and his diction does not appeal to all readers.

 

I think one of the most perceptive comments on CAS' Hyperborea stories comes from Steve Behrends, who wrote a critical guide to CAS' writings. To quote Behrends directly (speaking of the Hyperborea stories collectively):

 

"The prose is intentionally pretentious, so as to mock pretension - a technique found more recently in the work of Jack Vance. We encounter elegantly depicted scenes of great silliness, absurd speeches delivered by sagacious characters, humor that is droll, dry, quiet, and above all, mock solemn." (emphasis Behrends)

 

Beyond Jack Vance's work (which I am also a fan of), another well-known use of this technique can be found in Charles Dickens' The Pickwick Papers.

 

That said, when I first read CAS many years ago, I did not much like his work at first, for many of the reasons you cited in the podcast episode. But after re-visiting his work a few times, I now think his best work is brilliant, and ranks up there with writers like Dickens, Vance, and François Rabelais. The caveat being that CAS did write some truly awful and formulaic stories, but I don't include "The Door to Saturn" in that category - I think it's really quite an amazing work of short fiction.

Oh, wow, I didn't know about Steve Behrends at all, but I've just ordered a copy of that book, so you'll hear us start engaging with his readings whenever we next get to Smith -- which I hope will be soon, because I really enjoy his work as well. Indeed, I was surprised at how much I disliked this story because I usually think of Smith as the best word-smith of the Weird Tales Big Three.

 

I'm interested in this comparison with Vance (who's come up this week over on our Gene Wolfe forum, too), because both Smith and Vance are huge influences on Gene Wolfe's The Book of the New Sun, but I've never really thought about them as having similar styles. In fact, I was reading Vance's The Languages of Pao the same week we recorded this episode, and I just didn't notice that kind of similarity -- though both stories do focus more on world-building than on storytelling (which I liked quite a bit in the Vance). I'm going to put one of Vance's Dying Earth stories on the January ballot, and since it seems like there's a lot of interest in him, I imagine we'll have an episode on him out early next year. If you've got a particular favorite of Vance's, let us know.

 

We're glad to have you listening, and thank you so much for joining us on Patreon -- that's a huge help, and we're really excited about the goals that we're closing in on.

Although Behrends didn't mention it in his chapter about CAS' Hyperborea stories, I suspect his comment about Jack Vance's work was probably specific to the Dying Earth stories, which do have more of the "mock solemn" tone than is found in other Vance writings.

 

Glad to hear you'll be covering the Dying Earth stories on the podcast(s) in the future - those are truly wonderful works!

Hi Jeffrey, thanks for these additional insights into Smith's writing style. Certainly, I think that his style of mock solemnity or mock pretension absolutely works in many cases. Unfortunately for me, the style just didn't work with the plot of the story, which was a sort of odd picaresque, featuring two characters who don't have too much to do.

 

I'm excited to read more Smith and continue to explore his influence on other writers that I admire. Thanks again for following along with us!

New Posts
  • What an odd story! As with a few before it, I didn't enjoy this one much when reading it, but the discussion in the episode really helped put a better perspective on it. In particular I really liked the framing of it as a plague story with the spectre of cholera hanging over everything (for some reason it hadn't occurred to me that the omen of death was an omen of them getting cholera), and the idea of it as a reaction to the science of the Enlightenment. Thanks also for making the weird political digression make sense! It completely boggled my mind what it had to do with anything else in the story. I'm still not completely convinced, but I guess it worked for Poe. Overall I thought this story had a lot of great set-up; the evocative description of the cholera epidemic and the tantalizing hints of the tomes in the library would make an excellent introduction to a different weird story. As it stands, though, the description of the beast and the revelation about it didn't do anything for me. Maybe that's a problem of perspective as a modern reader, which at least would fit with the theme of the story in a roundabout sort of way.
  • Great podcast. About the political situation in the 1840’s there was in 1848 an outbreak almost simultaneously of revolutionwry reform of governments all over the place. The old monarchies were changed to the forms that held until World War One. A history podcast I listen to covers this year in a whole series. It is called “Revolutions” it is done by Mike Duncan. Each series he covers a different revolution and in series 7 he covers 1848. It is about 20 some episodes each from 30 to 50 mins long about this year. I’m not this far in his podcast yet, I’m on series 5 currently, but each episode is extremely well made and informative while being entertaining. I’m sure Poe was current with the political tempest that was brewing at the time he wrote this story. It makes me even more interested to get to this series about the history.
  • When I was young I didn't read much comics. In the Netherlands 'strips' (comics) were usually the well known comics from Belgium (Tintin, Spike and Suzy) or funny and/or dirty ones. I never really liked them. American comics here were and are expensive, so I didn't read them. But I had friends who did have some, and they gave me Sandman, after which I was a huge fan from this series and Neil Gaiman. I then read Alan Moore’s comics (Moore being Gaiman’s mentor) and loved his comics too, including Swamp Thing. But, as I said, comics are expensive here, and I stopped buying them (mainly Vertigo imprints) after my graduation, unfortunately (though I once got the first issues of Preacher). I liked the episode on the podcast, so I scribbled some of the titles on paper. Moore's Providence already was on my wishlist, but 'alas', they are out of sale here (and I don't have a credit card or the like, so I can't buy things from 'far away' directly). But I keep trying. I do have a copy of stories of Lovecraft, adapted into comics by the (over here well-known) artist Erik Kriek ( http://www.gutsmancomics.com/news/ ). Though I didn't read any other books by him, I think he likes weird tales (although he also likes to make parodies and to add the afore mentioned sexual dirtiness). Many of his comics are translated into several languages. His adaptation of Lovecraft ( http://www.gutsmancomics.com/works/comics/#44 ) earned a lot of praise.

Claytemple Media is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.